Thank you for explaining the nuances of this case. You ask important questions which the public is unlikely to consider, e.g. were there 3rd parties involved considering GCHQ's monitoring of internet downloads making it more likely he got it from a person.
Thank you for explaining the nuances of this case. You ask important questions which the public is unlikely to consider, e.g. were there 3rd parties involved considering GCHQ's monitoring of internet downloads making it more likely he got it from a person.